Original Research

Determinants and impediments of whistle-blowing in local government councils: A case study of the South-East District Council, Botswana

Abiodun M.T. Omotoye
Africa’s Public Service Delivery & Performance Review | Vol 5, No 1 | a194 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/apsdpr.v5i1.194 | © 2017 Abiodun M.T. Omotoye | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 28 August 2017 | Published: 21 November 2017

About the author(s)

Abiodun M.T. Omotoye, Public Sector Reforms Unit, Botswana Institute for Development Policy Analysis, Botswana

Share this article

Bookmark and Share


This article investigates the perceptions of public service employees regarding the role of whistle-blowing in local government. Whistle-blowing has received increased attention and support as a means of detecting and correcting wrongdoing in organisations. Yet, as this case study discusses, the absence of whistle-blower protection measures and fear of reprisal and job loss deter potential witnesses from reporting wrongdoing in the workplace. A mixed research method approach was employed to undertake the study. A self-administered questionnaire was distributed to public servants employed within the South-East District Council (SEDC) and literature related to corruption and whistle-blowing was reviewed. The findings indicate that public service employees strongly support the role whistle-blowing has to play in curbing corruption in the workplace, particularly if the corrupt activity could potentially threaten people’s lives and suppress social justice. However, the absence of whistle-blower protection measures was cited as the most significant impediment to reporting wrongdoing. The article proposes the need for the SEDC to adopt effective policies and procedures that place a strong emphasis on providing protection for employees to disclose misconduct and fraudulent conduct.


Whistleblowing Determinants; Botswana


Total abstract views: 1316
Total article views: 2294

Crossref Citations

No related citations found.