Abstract
Background: The Eastern Cape, one of South Africa’s most economically challenged provinces, continues to grapple with high unemployment, poverty and underdeveloped infrastructure. To address these persistent issues, local economic development agencies (LEDAs) have been established within municipal structures to promote sustainable economic growth. The efficacy of such LEDAs has been brought into question.
Aim: This study evaluates the efficacy of LEDAs in the Eastern Cape, drawing on findings from the 2023 Auditor-General’s Report.
Setting: The research examines eight LEDAs operating across various municipalities in the Eastern Cape, each tasked with advancing local economic development and improving livelihoods in their communities.
Methods: A content analysis of the 2023 Auditor-General’s Report was conducted, using secondary data from official sources. The analysis was guided by frameworks related to financial management, performance, governance and internal controls.
Results: Three findings emerged. Firstly, oversight was hindered by agency-related inefficiencies within the LEDAs. Secondly, weak internal structures and inadequate responses impeded effective performance. Thirdly, micro-level challenges within the agencies limited their ability to respond to broader environmental issues.
Conclusion: The study highlights systemic weaknesses in the functioning of LEDAs in the Eastern Cape. Strengthening governance, financial controls and compliance mechanisms can enhance service delivery and improve performance management.
Contribution: This research deepens understanding of the operational challenges facing LEDAs and offers practical recommendations to enhance their role in fostering local economic development and addressing the province’s socio-economic challenges.
Keywords: local economic development agency; South Africa; local economy; development; Eastern Cape.
Introduction
There is growing attention on the need to promote local economic development (LED), particularly in developing countries like South Africa. These economies face persistent challenges such as poverty, inequality and unemployment (National Planning Commission 2012). Statistics South Africa (2023) highlights alarmingly high levels of both unemployment and poverty, which directly affect local economies and undermine sustainable livelihoods (Mathibe & Chinyamurindi 2023).
Local economic development has been conceptualised as a localised strategy to promote social and economic progress (Kanyane 2008). At its core, it aims to transform livelihoods by creating opportunities that address poverty, redistribute resources and bridge social divides (Jiang et al. 2022; Reddy 2016). These goals align with the developmental mandate outlined in Chapter 7 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa. However, how best to achieve these outcomes remains contested. For instance, Rogerson (2013) emphasises the importance of consultative partnerships between local leaders and community groups.
Positioning the role of LED is critical for several reasons. Firstly, it serves as a catalyst for creating environments in which communities can thrive. Secondly, it offers a practical platform for livelihood transformation (Lawrence & Rogerson 2018). Thirdly, it acts as a vehicle for coordinated, synergistic efforts involving diverse stakeholders. Municipalities play a pivotal role in facilitating these processes, particularly within the South African context (Kanyane 2008; Nel 2001).
One of the key instruments designed to drive LED is the local economic development agency (LEDA). According to Suarez et al. (2022), LEDAs are mandated to use public funds to support social and economic development. Their creation aimed to overcome bureaucratic constraints within municipalities, enabling them to operate with greater autonomy, agility and efficiency (Rogerson 2019). These agencies are also intended to realise the objectives outlined in Section 152 of the Constitution (1996) and the White Paper on Local Government (1998), serving as responsive tools to address both local and national developmental challenges (Mashamaite 2018; Rogerson 2019).
From a service delivery perspective, LEDAs have become strategic hubs within local municipalities (South African Cities Network 2019). The Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs (COGTA 2019) underscores the importance of local stakeholder partnerships in enhancing LEDA effectiveness. However, scholars caution against overly optimistic views. While LEDAs have been praised for addressing local challenges, questions about their long-term sustainability – especially in resource-constrained settings – persist (Khambule 2018a; Maxegwana et al. 2015; Shava & Chinyamurindi 2022).
Despite their importance, concerns remain regarding the actual efficacy of LEDAs in addressing local development challenges. This concern aligns with findings by the Auditor-General South Africa (AGSA), which points to persistent deficiencies in governance, financial management and service delivery (AGSA 2023). These issues significantly undermine the agencies’ effectiveness (Marais, Cloete & Denoon-Stevens 2022), raising critical questions about whether LEDAs are fulfilling their mandates and contributing meaningfully to LED.
Legislative and policy context for local economic development agencies
The establishment and operation of LEDAs in South Africa are guided by the legislative framework outlined in the Constitution of South Africa, which mandates local governments to promote social and economic development (Republic of South Africa 1996). This developmental vision is further reinforced by the White Paper on Local Government (1998), which introduces the concept of developmental local government (Republic of South Africa 1998).
To operationalise the mandates, the local government’s key legislation, such as the Municipal Systems Act (2000) and the Municipal Finance Management Act (2003), provides mechanisms for municipalities to plan, implement and manage LED initiatives through Integrated Development Plans (IDPs) and financially sound governance (Republic of South Africa 2000, 2003). These Acts allow for the creation of LEDAs as municipal entities to implement development projects with a degree of autonomy and flexibility.
National LED policy frameworks have further shaped the role of LEDAs. The initial National Framework for LED (2006–2011) emphasised leveraging local assets and partnerships for inclusive growth (DPLG 2006). Subsequent frameworks, including the 2013–2018 and 2018–2028 versions, introduced a dual focus on pro-poor and pro-growth strategies, and more recently, stressed the role of innovation systems and urban-rural linkages in driving local economic development (CoGTA 2013, 2018b). Despite this enabling policy environment, LEDAs still face several challenges.
The work of local economic development agencies in the Eastern Cape province of South Africa
The Eastern Cape province of South Africa remains one of the country’s most economically disadvantaged regions, marked by high levels of poverty, unemployment and underdeveloped infrastructure (Statistics South Africa 2023). Recent data show that the province has the highest official unemployment rate of 42.4%, compared to the national average of 32.9%. An alarming 66.5% of young people (aged 15–34 years) are unemployed (QLFS Q1:2024). Approximately 72.9% of the province’s population lives below the upper-bound poverty line (R1335 per person per month), the second-highest rate nationally (Stats SA 2023). These socio-economic challenges have persisted despite numerous efforts to stimulate sustainable economic growth and improve livelihoods. In response, eight local LEDAs have been established – one in each municipality – to spearhead LED initiatives. A key objective of these agencies is to address the province’s urgent development challenges, including the enhancement of local value chains by strengthening structures mandated to drive economic development (Eastern Cape Department of Rural Development and Agrarian Reform 2018). The role of LEDAs is particularly critical in resource-constrained contexts such as the Eastern Cape (Khambule 2018b). Consequently, there is a growing need to examine how these agencies can effectively contribute to sustainable economic development (COGTA 2018a).
Research problem and objectives of the study
The research problem is underscored by the persistent underperformance of LEDAs in the Eastern Cape, evidenced by recurring issues such as irregular expenditure, material misstatements in financial reports, weak governance and poor internal controls (AGSA 2023). Recent studies further emphasise the negative impact of weak financial management and governance failures on the overall effectiveness of LEDAs (Ndevu & Muller 2021; Van Der Waldt 2023). This study presents a novel approach by integrating governance theory with results-based monitoring and evaluation (RBME) to examine how individual agency and structural limitations contribute to persistent underperformance. Unlike previous research that relied on case studies or stakeholder opinions, this study leverages detailed insights from the 2023 Auditor-General’s Report, ensuring a more nuanced and evidence-based analysis. Beyond merely identifying problems, this study also proposes practical, resource-conscious solutions tailored to contexts like the Eastern Cape. These challenges hinder the ability of LEDAs to fulfil their development mandates, highlighting the need for a deeper and more nuanced understanding of how such issues can be addressed to support LED. The study builds on previous research by engaging with the data at three levels that have not been explored before. While prior studies identify the issues that occur, this study reveals why they persist. It demonstrates the causal link between micro-level failures and macro-level challenges. Lastly, this deeper analysis informs actionable solutions.
Guided by the literature, the study poses the following research question: Informed by the findings of the 2023 Auditor-General’s Report, how do the aspects of agentic powers, structure, and the dynamic interplay of micro and macro environmental factors manifest and affect the performance of LEDAs in the Eastern Cape province of South Africa?
Literature review
Conceptual framework
This study’s conceptual framework is shaped by the need to understand three interrelated issues critical to the functioning of LEDAs as outlined by Annosi et al. (2022).
Firstly, agentic powers refer to the ability of LEDAs to exercise discretion and leadership within the constraints of governance systems. As institutional mechanisms for implementing local economic strategies, LEDAs require strong governance, financial accountability, and alignment with national and municipal policies (World Bank 2020). Their agentic role is crucial in promoting investment, driving economic transformation, and facilitating growth within municipal and provincial structures (United Nations 2019).
Secondly, organisational structure significantly influences LEDA performance. Effective public financial management is vital to ensure fiscal discipline, transparency and performance-based budgeting (OECD 2021). Structural reforms are necessary to address financial inefficiencies, corruption and misallocation of resources (Kusek & Rist 2020). The World Bank (2020) outlines six pillars of effective public financial management: (1) budgeting and resource allocation; (2) public expenditure management; (3) financial accountability and reporting; (4) auditing and oversight; (5) revenue management and (6) performance-based financial systems. For LEDAs, attention to financial governance, expenditure controls and accountability mechanisms is crucial in achieving developmental objectives (AGSA 2023).
Thirdly, the dynamic interplay between micro- and macro-environmental factors affects LEDA operations (Chigori, Chinyamurindi & Rungani 2024). Performance indicators are central to understanding this interplay and to fostering local economic transformation (United Nations 2019). A focus on co-creating value is essential for entities tasked with poverty alleviation (Mathibe, Chinyamurindi & Hove-Sibanda 2023). Moreover, sound strategic planning is necessary to address the unpredictability of local operating environments (Chinyamurindi, Mathibe & Hove-Sibanda 2023).
Theoretical framework
The study is grounded in two complementary theories: Governance theory and RBME. Governance theory (Rhodes 1996) explores how power, decision-making and resource allocation influence institutional performance. It emphasises decentralisation, transparency and stakeholder participation as pillars of effective governance (ed. Bevir 2011).
In the context of LEDAs, governance theory helps explain how partnerships among municipalities, businesses and communities can be leveraged to address socio-economic challenges (Khambule 2018b). However, weak governance undermines service delivery and restricts the agencies’ ability to achieve developmental outcomes (Lawrence & Rogerson 2019). Applying governance theory thus supports the design of accountable and responsive LEDAs.
The second theoretical consideration is the RBME theory (Kusek & Rist 2004). The RBME theory focuses on measuring results through outputs, outcomes and their impacts rather than merely tracking activities. This effort results in measurement that promotes performance measurement, accountability and evidence-informed decision-making (UNDP 2019). The RBME framework rests on six components: (1) clear goal setting; (2) prioritising performance indicators; (3) robust data collection; (4) effective reporting; (5) continuous evaluation and (6) active stakeholder participation (World Bank 2010).
Applying these two theories potentially allows LEDAs to track their performance in job creation, economic growth and investment promotion, while also identifying the areas of financial and governance inefficiency (Kusek & Rist 2020).
Empirical literature review
The following empirical studies illuminate the interaction between agentic powers, structural factors and the micro-macro environmental dynamics that shape LEDA performance in the Eastern Cape.
Ngumbela (2023) examined LEDAs’ role in poverty alleviation and found that while LEDAs are mandated to drive development projects, their agentic powers are often restricted by structural limitations, namely inadequate financial and human resources. Historical underdevelopment and weak municipal revenue bases further constrain their capacity to implement and sustain projects. Similarly, Hendricks and Fraser (2003) explored agricultural development challenges and identified structural inefficiencies in local governance. They found that misalignment between national policies and local implementation created fragmentation in service delivery and resource allocation. Their findings underscore the need for integrated planning and structural coherence to strengthen LEDAs.
Marais (2011) investigated the role of partnerships in LED in the Eastern Cape. His findings indicate that political interference and limited community engagement severely hinder project sustainability. Local economic development initiatives often reflect political priorities rather than community needs, resulting in poor alignment and ineffective implementation. This highlights the importance of participatory planning and empowered local governance.
Edoun, Rameetse and Pooe (2023) examined capacity-building as a driver of local governance performance. They argued that improving human capital through training, skills development and resource provision is essential for enhancing structural capacity. Accountability mechanisms such as audits and transparent reporting were also emphasised as enablers of good governance. Merino and De los Ríos Carmenado (2012) further assert that capacity-building enhances not only organisational effectiveness but also community trust. Drawing on Potter and Brough’s (2004) Capacity Pyramid Model, the authors advocate for prioritising competency assessments and skills training to empower LEDA personnel.
Together, the presented literature highlights the multifaceted challenges faced by LEDAs in the Eastern Cape. Ngumbela (2023) and Hendricks and Fraser (2003) demonstrate how structural constraints limit agentic capacity. Marais (2011) reveals the effects of weak community engagement and political interference, while Edoun et al. (2023) stress the importance of capacity-building and structural reform. These findings suggest that improving LEDA effectiveness requires a holistic approach – strengthening agentic powers, restructuring governance frameworks and fostering meaningful community partnerships.
Guided by the literature, the study poses the following research question: Informed by the findings of the 2023 Auditor-General’s Report, how do agentic powers (of LEDA executives and middle managers), internal governance structures, and the interaction between agency operations and municipal/provincial policy environments affect LEDA performance?
By addressing this question, the study aims to contribute to ongoing efforts to strengthen LED, particularly in economically disadvantaged regions such as the Eastern Cape. This seeks to enhance understanding of the systemic challenges and opportunities confronting LEDAs, ultimately supporting the development of more effective, accountable and responsive institutions capable of fulfilling their socio-economic mandates. This study aims to inform policy and practice on how LEDAs can more effectively contribute to LED in resource-constrained contexts.
Research methods and design
This study adopts a qualitative research approach to address the proposed research question. Specifically, it utilises the contents of the 2023 Auditor-General’s Report on LEDAs in the Eastern Cape province of South Africa. The aim is to systematically examine and interpret the report’s findings, with a particular focus on the performance, governance and operational challenges of the LEDAs. A descriptive and exploratory research design was employed to analyse the audit findings, and thematic content analysis was used to examine each LEDA report, focusing on identifying and interpreting recurring patterns within the data (Braun et al. 2019). By exploring themes and patterns within the Auditor-General’s Reports, the study provides in-depth insights into the functioning of LEDAs.
The primary method of inquiry is secondary data analysis, drawing exclusively from publicly accessible audit reports. The sampling frame comprised eight operational LEDAs within the Eastern Cape province. These reports were obtained from the Office of the Auditor-General, as they are available in the public domain. Table 1 presents the descriptive information of the LEDAs included in the study.
| TABLE 1: Participating local economic development agencies. |
It should be noted that the eight LEDAs, shown in Table 1, were the ones whose documents were available for access.
The analysis followed a two-phase process. Firstly, an individual case analysis was conducted for each LEDA to explore agency-specific issues and performance trends. Secondly, a cross-case analysis was used to compare and synthesise themes across all eight LEDAs. A combination of manual coding and computer-assisted content analysis was used, as recommended in prior studies (Reuben & Bobat 2014). The data from each report were analysed in alignment with the research question, using the structured steps of thematic analysis to ensure consistency, depth and analytical rigour (Braun et al. 2019).
Ethical considerations
As the study relied on secondary data collection, ethical clearance was sought and obtained through the participating university of Fort Hare. This was formally declared during the ethics application process. Approval was granted by the Inter-Faculty Human Research Ethics Committee at the University of Fort Hare (CHI001-24), which endorsed the project’s ethical compliance, including Phase 1 of the study – an analysis of the 2023 Auditor-General’s Report on LEDAs operating within the Eastern Cape province of South Africa.
Results
Based on the thematic content analysis of the Auditor-General’s 2023 report, three core themes emerged. This section presents the key themes.
Theme 1: Oversight challenges rooted in agentic issues within local economic development agencies
The analysis revealed consistent concerns regarding weak oversight linked to agentic issues within the LEDAs. Across the eight cases, the lack or ineffective exercise of agentic powers – particularly in areas of financial governance and supply chain management (SCM) – was found to undermine the operational and developmental performance of the agencies. A recurring agentic functionary implicated in these findings was the SCM portfolio, which was frequently associated with non-compliance, irregular expenditure and poor financial oversight. In several instances, LEDAs failed to enforce procurement regulations and internal controls, thereby compromising financial accountability.
For example, in the Alfred Nzo Development Agency (ANDA):
Irregular expenditure to the amount of R463 529 was incurred as a result of non-compliance with SCM regulations and overspending of the budget, with a cumulative balance of R37.2 million still remaining to be investigated. (Auditor-General Report)
The absence of a timely investigation into such irregularities raises concerns about weak financial oversight and the erosion of institutional accountability mechanisms.
Similarly, in the Buffalo City Metropolitan Development Agency (BCMDA):
Irregular expenditure of R26.3 million was incurred as a result of non-compliance with the SCM Regulations. (Auditor-General Report)
Likewise, the Ntinga OR Tambo Development Agency (NTINGA) was cited for:
Irregular expenditure of R1.3 million, which resulted from not following proper SCM processes and the operating policies of the municipal entity. (Auditor-General Report)
These examples point to a systemic pattern of procurement-related non-compliance across the agencies. Additionally, fruitless and wasteful expenditure further illustrated the extent of oversight failure.
For instance, the Auditor-General reported that NTINGA incurred:
Fruitless and wasteful expenditure of R1.4 million, which resulted from interest and penalties due to late payments. (Auditor-General Report)
Another development agency in ANDA reported:
Fruitless and wasteful expenditure amounting to R57 189, with a cumulative balance of R3.4 million still remaining to be investigated. (Auditor-General Report)
Such expenditures suggest not only financial mismanagement but also a failure to implement remedial actions, thus reflecting deeper structural and agentic deficiencies. These findings collectively illustrate how ineffective exercise of agentic authority, particularly within key governance portfolios like SCM, undermines the credibility and functionality of LEDAs. Persistent irregularities and unresolved audit findings point to broader systemic governance failures that challenge the agencies’ ability to fulfil their mandates. Table 2 outlines additional examples across the remaining LEDAs that reflect similar oversight concerns associated with agentic issues.
| TABLE 2: Theme 1 summary – Oversight failures and expenditure issues. |
The next thematic strand as a finding from the study gives focus on the lacklustre structures in LEDAs and their failure to respond to the challenges that are faced within the local economies of the Eastern Cape. These issues receive attention next.
Theme 2: The presence of lacklustre structures and responses within the local economic development agencies as an impediment to effectual performance
The second emerging theme highlights the structural and operational inefficiencies within LEDAs, which significantly hinder their ability to execute their developmental mandates. The analysis points to widespread issues related to organisational capacity, financial management and internal compliance systems, all of which compromise the agencies’ performance and responsiveness.
A clear example of these structural shortcomings is seen in the Amathole Economic Development Agency (ASPIRE). The Auditor-General issued a qualified audit opinion, noting:
The financial statements submitted for auditing were not prepared in all material respects in accordance with the requirements of section 122(1) of the MFMA. (Auditor-General Report)
This finding by the Auditor-General reflects a fundamental failure in meeting core financial reporting standards, suggesting deeper structural challenges in financial oversight and compliance. Similar deficiencies were observed in the Chris Hani Development Agency (CHDA). The Auditor-General reported:
Net cash flows from operating activities were not correctly prepared and disclosed … due to errors in calculating the cash received from the sale of goods and services and cash paid to suppliers. (Auditor-General Report)
This finding by the Auditor-General points to critical gaps in the CHDA’s internal accounting processes and financial capacity, with implications for accurate reporting and fiscal control. In the Mandela Bay Development Agency (MBDA), structural weaknesses were evident in the procurement system. The Auditor-General flagged:
Contracts were issued to tax non-compliant suppliers and… to suppliers before the deviation or proper SCM processes had taken place. (Auditor-General Report)
Such violations of procurement procedures (as evident in the CHDA and MBDA) highlight entrenched dysfunctions in internal control mechanisms and a failure to comply with basic legal and regulatory standards. Further, these examples appear to also demonstrate that poorly structured internal systems, lack of compliance enforcement and weak institutional capacity significantly undermine the effectiveness of LEDAs. Without adequate structural responses to governance and operational challenges, these agencies remain constrained in their ability to deliver on their socio-economic mandates.
Table 3 provides further examples of other LEDAs facing similar structural and operational inefficiencies aligned with this theme.
| TABLE 3: Theme 2 summary – Structural deficiencies and performance impediments. |
The final thematic strand from the analysis gives cadence to the lack of environmental awareness and impactful responses to the challenges being faced within the Eastern Cape province. An issue here is the interplay between micro- and macro issues within the LEDA as impediments. These issues will be addressed in this section.
Theme 3: Lack of impactful responses to micro- and macro-environmental challenges because of micro issues within the local economic development agencies
Local economic development agencies are designed to strategically address macro-environmental challenges such as poverty, underdevelopment and infrastructure deficits. However, inefficiencies at the micro-level and internal governance issues limit this capacity to respond. Internal deficiencies and inaccuracies may hinder the LEDAs from responding to macro-environmental challenges they intend to address.
For instance, the macro-level goal for BCMDA is to become ‘an attractive home for investment’; however, the Auditor-General highlights that performance was undermined by ‘material misstatements in the annual performance report submitted for auditing’ and the fact that ‘management did not correct all of the misstatements’. This reflects how internal inaccuracies translate into diminished developmental impact.
Similarly, the ASPIRE aimed to contribute to the regional economy but could not account adequately for ‘refunds due to the status of the accounting records’ and ‘tax payable of R2.2 million’. These deficiencies limit the agency’s credibility and responsiveness to broader socio-economic issues.
Informed by these case examples, Table 4 reports further on other LEDAs and the issues related to Theme 3 on the lack of impactful responses to macro-environmental challenges because of micro issues within the LEDA.
| TABLE 4: Theme 3 summary – Micro-level issues hindering macro-level impact. |
These micro- and macro-level issues may undermine institutional integrity, making the LEDAs ineffective in addressing sustainable responses to the macroeconomic and social challenges faced by their regions. The ‘Discussion’ section analyses the findings from the study.
Discussion
This study assessed the efficacy of LEDAs in the Eastern Cape using the 2023 Auditor-General’s Report, with a specific focus on financial management, performance, governance and accountability. One of the key findings relates to oversight challenges associated with agentic issues within LEDAs. The analysis revealed significant governance shortcomings, particularly in the areas of oversight and accountability. Common issues included irregular expenditure, financial mismanagement and non-compliance with SCM regulations. These challenges mirror those observed in other local government structures (Ngumbela 2023). Drawing on governance theory, the study emphasises the need to strengthen governance capabilities within LEDAs (ed. Bevir 2011). This includes reinforcing agentic powers and enabling these structures to exercise their oversight responsibilities effectively (Hendricks & Fraser 2003).
The second major finding highlights the structural inefficiencies that constrain the performance of LEDAs. The Auditor-General’s Report pointed to weak organisational structures that impede strategic planning, financial reporting and internal control. The application of RBME (Kusek & Rist 2004) offers a practical framework to address these deficiencies. There is a need for LEDAs to adopt clear strategic plans supported by structures that are open to capacity-building and continuous improvement. Importantly, agentic powers and robust structural arrangements must work in tandem to support broader institutional reforms (Edoun et al. 2023).
Finally, the study calls for LEDAs that are responsive to both micro- and macro-level challenges in their operating environments. As noted by Marais (2011), external socio-economic and political changes often impact local development projects. The Auditor-General’s Reports underscore the importance of adaptability, accountability and responsiveness in LEDA operations. Given their direct link to communities, LEDAs should prioritise value co-creation (Mathibe et al. 2023) and participatory governance (Ngumbela 2023) to align initiatives with local needs and ensure developmental impact.
Recommendations
To address the systemic challenges faced by LEDAs in the Eastern Cape, this study proposes the following key recommendations.
Firstly, strengthen agentic powers through capacity-building and accountability mechanisms. There is a critical need to enhance the agentic role of LEDAs by investing in capacity-building initiatives. Training and skills development are essential for improving individual and institutional capabilities (Potter & Brough 2004). These efforts not only reinforce the governance capacity of LEDAs (Giddens 1984) but also ensure the implementation of robust accountability mechanisms that can promote transparency, compliance and improved performance (Edoun et al. 2023).
Secondly, revitalising structural frameworks for adaptive and responsive performance is essential, as LEDAs require revitalised organisational structures that can adapt to evolving socio-economic conditions. Effective structural frameworks should support integrated planning and performance monitoring, enabling LEDAs to align their activities with broader development goals (DPLG 2006). Drawing from Emirbayer and Mische’s (1998) theory of agency, such structures should facilitate responsive and future-oriented action. Moreover, fostering collaboration between LEDAs, municipalities and local communities is vital to ensure that development initiatives are contextually relevant and collectively owned (Khambule 2018b).
Thirdly, enhance governance practices and stakeholder partnerships. There is a need to strengthen governance within LEDAs, as this is essential to responding effectively to uncertain and dynamic environments. This includes cultivating strategic partnerships, particularly public–private collaborations, to enhance resource mobilisation and service delivery (Rogerson 2014). Improved governance also fosters community ownership of local projects, enhances credibility, and supports adherence to timelines and compliance standards. As Van der Waldt (2023) notes, stronger governance frameworks can help mitigate risks related to non-compliance and reinforce the legitimacy of LEDAs.
Limitations and future research
While this study offers valuable insights into the performance of LEDAs in the Eastern Cape, several limitations should be noted.
Firstly, the research relied exclusively on the 2023 Auditor-General’s Report, which primarily focuses on financial and compliance-related matters. As such, the analysis may not fully capture broader sociopolitical, institutional or contextual factors influencing LEDA performance. Future research could address this limitation by incorporating qualitative methods, such as interviews or focus groups with LEDA staff, stakeholders and community members, to provide deeper insights into operational and contextual dynamics.
Secondly, the findings of this study are specific to the Eastern Cape province and the 2023 reporting period. As such, caution should be exercised in generalising the results to other LEDAs across South Africa. Future studies could adopt a comparative approach, examining the performance of LEDAs across different provinces to identify regional patterns, best practices and context-specific challenges.
Finally, the study’s cross-sectional nature limits its ability to capture performance trends over time. Future research could employ longitudinal designs to monitor LEDA performance across multiple reporting periods. This would enable researchers to assess the long-term impact of institutional reforms, governance improvements and capacity-building initiatives, offering more robust evidence to inform policy and practice.
Conclusion
This study evaluated the performance of LEDAs in the Eastern Cape, drawing on findings from the 2023 Auditor-General’s Report. The analysis identified three critical challenges: weak agentic oversight, structural inefficiencies and limited responsiveness to macro-environmental challenges, largely stemming from internal operational weaknesses. Guided by governance theory and RBME frameworks, the study underscores the need to strengthen governance systems, enhance institutional capacity and adopt participatory development approaches. These frameworks support the argument for improved financial management, structural reform and community engagement as essential strategies for enhancing LEDA effectiveness. While LEDAs remain key instruments in driving LED, their long-term relevance and impact depend on their ability to overcome systemic governance and institutional shortcomings. If the study’s recommendations are implemented, LEDAs can potentially strengthen their operational performance, restore public trust and play a more transformative role in advancing inclusive socio-economic development within the Eastern Cape province of South Africa.
Acknowledgements
This study was conducted by researchers at the University of Fort Hare, with funding and commissioning support from the Eastern Cape Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs (COGTA).
Competing interests
The author reported that they received funding from the partnership with COGTA in conducting this research, which may be affected by the research reported in the enclosed publication. The author has disclosed those interests fully and has implemented an approved plan for managing any potential conflicts arising from their involvement. The terms of these funding arrangements have been reviewed and approved by the affiliated University in accordance with its policy on objectivity in research.
Authors’ contributions
Y.M., M.S., N.N. and W.T.C. contributed equally to the conceptualisation, writing and editing of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article, discussed the results and approved the final version for submission and publication.
Funding information
The study received funding from the partnership with COGTA in conducting this research.
Data availability
The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its references.
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and are the product of professional research. They do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any affiliated institution, funder, agency, or that of the publisher. The authors are responsible for this article’s results, findings, and content.
References
Annosi, M.C., Raez, R.M.O., Appio, F.P. & Del Giudice, T., 2022, ‘An integrative review of innovations in the agricultural sector: The roles of agency, structure, and their dynamic interplay’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 185, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122035
Auditor-General of South Africa (AGSA), 2023, Consolidated general report on the local government audit outcomes for the 2021/22 financial year, AGSA, Pretoria.
Bevir, M. (ed.), 2011, The SAGE handbook of governance, Sage, London.
Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N. & Terry, G., 2019, Thematic analysis, Springer, Singapore.
Chigori, D., Chinyamurindi, W.T. & Rungani, E., 2024, ‘Development of a dynamic innovation management model for ambidextrous SMEs: Insights from a bibliometrics analysis’, South African Journal of Business Management 55(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v55i1.4282
Chinyamurindi, W., Mathibe, M. & Hove-Sibanda, P., 2023, ‘Social enterprise performance in South Africa: The role of strategic planning and networking capability’, Journal of Social Entrepreneurship 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2023.2212672
COGTA, 2019, Local economic development, viewed 07 April 2025, from http://www.cogta.gov.za/?page_id=162.
Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs (CoGTA), 2013, National framework for LED in South Africa (2013–2018), CoGTA, Pretoria.
Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs (COGTA), 2018a, The national framework for local economic development: Creating innovation-driven local economies 2018–2028, COGTA, Pretoria.
Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs (CoGTA), 2018b, National framework for LED in South Africa (2018–2028): The role of cities in advancing local systems of innovation, COGTA, Pretoria.
Department of Provincial and Local Government (DPLG), 2006, National framework for LED in South Africa (2006–2011), DPLG, Pretoria.
Eastern Cape Department of Rural Development and Agrarian Reform, 2018, Eastern Cape rural development strategy, viewed 18 February 2025, from https://ecagriculture.gov.za/documents/.
Edoun, E.I., Rameetse, V.K. & Pooe, S., 2023, ‘Capacity building as a tool for effective local governance in South Africa’, Journal of Public Administration, Finance and Law 29, 111–121. https://doi.org/10.47743/jopafl-2023-29-10
Emirbayer, M. & Mische, A., 1998, ‘What is agency?’, American Journal of Sociology 103(4), 962–1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294
Giddens, A., 1984, The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Hendricks, F. & Fraser, G., 2003, Obstacles to agricultural development in the communal areas of the Eastern Cape: A report for the Eastern Cape provincial growth and development plan, viewed 17 March 2025, from https://www.fao.org/ag/AGP/agpc/doc/Counprof/southafrica/southafrica.html.
Jiang, S., Tan, X., Hu, P., Wang, Y., Shi, L., Ma, Z. & Lu, G., 2022, ‘Air pollution and economic growth under local government competition: Evidence from China, 2007–2016’, Journal of Cleaner Production 334, 130231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130231
Kanyane, M.H., 2008, Exploring the nexus between local economic development and poverty reduction in South Africa, HSRC Press, Pretoria.
Khambule, I., 2018a, ‘Imagining an institutionalised social dialogue in the South African local government-led development landscape’, Forum for Development Studies 45(1), 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2017.1391875
Khambule, I., 2018b, ‘The role of local economic development agencies in South Africa’s developmental state ambitions’, Local Economy 33(3), 287–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094218766459
Kusek, J.Z. & Rist, R.C., 2004, Ten steps to a results-based monitoring and evaluation system: A handbook for development practitioners, World Bank, Washington, DC.
Kusek, J.Z. & Rist, R.C., 2020, Building effective evaluation systems in the public sector, World Bank, Washington, DC.
Lawrence, F. & Rogerson, C.M., 2018, ‘Local economic development agencies and place-based development: Evidence from South Africa’, Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series 41(41), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.2478/bog-2018-0024
Lawrence, P. & Rogerson, C.M., 2019, ‘Local economic development in South Africa: Policy, practice, and challenges’, Urban Forum 30(2), 144–165. https://doi.org/10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2019-30-supplement-010
Marais, L., 2011, ‘Local economic development and partnerships: Critical reflections from South Africa’, Community Development Journal 46(suppl_2), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsr007
Marais, L., Cloete, J. & Denoon-Stevens, S., 2022, ‘Local economic development agencies in South Africa: Challenges and opportunities’, Development Southern Africa 39(1), 1–15.
Mashamaite, K., 2018, Local economic development and municipal performance in South Africa: A critical review, SAAPAM, Johannesburg.
Mathibe, M. & Chinyamurindi, W.T., 2023, ‘The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on women entrepreneurs operating in the informal sector’, Journal of Contemporary Management 20(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.35683/jcman1013.199
Mathibe, T., Chinyamurindi, W.T. & Hove-Sibanda, P., 2023, ‘Value co-creation as a mediator between strategic planning and social enterprise performance’, Social Enterprise Journal 19(1), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-08-2021-0062
Maxegwana, M., Theron, F. & Draai, E., 2015, ‘Efficacy of participation in local economic development - Ngqushwa Local Municipality, Eastern Cape’, Africa Insight 44(4), 76–89.
Merino, S.S. & De los Ríos Carmenado, I., 2012, ‘Capacity building in development projects’, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 46, 960–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.231
National Planning Commission (NPC), 2012, National development plan 2030: Our future – make it work, The Presidency, Pretoria, viewed 17 February 2025, from https://www.nationalplanningcommission.org.za/assets/Documents/ndp-2030-our-future-make-it-work.pdf.
Ndevu, Z. & Muller, J., 2021, ‘Governance and accountability in local economic development agencies: A South African perspective’, Journal of Public Administration 56(2), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1857245
Nel, E., 2001, ‘Local economic development: A review and assessment of its current status in South Africa’, Urban Studies 38(7), 1003–1024. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980120051611
Ngumbela, X.G., 2023, ‘Role of local economic development in poverty alleviation in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa’, Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University 58(4), 507–519. https://doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.58.4.39
OECD, 2021, Government at a glance 2021, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.
Potter, C. & Brough, R., 2004, ‘Systemic capacity building: A hierarchy of needs’, Health Policy and Planning 19(5), 336–345. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czh038
Reddy, P.S., 2016, ‘The politics of service delivery in South Africa: The local government sphere in context’, Journal of Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa 12(1), a337. https://doi.org/10.4102/td.v12i1.337
Republic of South Africa, 1996, Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996. Chapter 7: Local Government, Government Printer, Pretoria.
Republic of South Africa, 1998, White paper on local government, Government Printer, Pretoria.
Republic of South Africa, 2000, Local government: Municipal systems Act 32 of 2000, Government Printer, Pretoria.
Republic of South Africa, 2003, Local government: Municipal finance management act 2003, Government Printer, Pretoria.
Reuben, S. & Bobat, S., 2014, ‘Constructing racial hierarchies of skill – Experiencing affirmative action in a South African organisation: A qualitative review’, South African Journal of Industrial Psychology 40(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v40i1.1158
Rhodes, R.A.W., 1996, ‘The new governance: Governing without government’, Political Studies 44(4), 652–667. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x
Rogerson, C.M., 2013, ‘Reframing local economic development futures in South Africa’, Journal of Public Administration 48(4), 640–655.
Rogerson, C.M., 2014, ‘Reframing place-based economic development in South Africa’, Development Southern Africa 31(1), 90–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2013.853610
Rogerson, C.M., 2019, ‘Local economic development in South Africa: Strategic challenges’, Development Southern Africa 36(6), 787–801. https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2019.1660853
Shava, H. & Chinyamurindi, W.T., 2022, ‘Barriers of growth within an informal sector business: Narratives of women subsistence entrepreneurs in South Africa’, African Journal of Economic and Management Studies 13(3), 328–343. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJEMS-08-2021-0354
South African Cities Network (SACN), 2019, Rethinking LED ‘Local Economic Development’ in Intermediate Cities, SACN, Johannesburg, viewed 07 April 2025, from http://www.sacities.net.
Stats SA (Statistics South Africa), 2023, Quarterly Labour Force Survey: Quarter 1, 2023, Stats SA, Pretoria, viewed 07 April 2025, from http://www.statssa.gov.za.
Suarez, F.J.T., Chicas, O.M., Troshani, R. & Coelho, J., 2022, Local economic development agencies for governance and internationalization of local economies, viewed 10 January 2023, from https://www.ideassonline.org/public/pdf/BrochureAdelENG.pdf.
UNDP, 2019, Handbook on planning, monitoring and evaluating for development results, United Nations Development Programme, New York, NY.
United Nations, 2019, World public sector report 2019: Sustainable development goal implementation challenges, United Nations, New York, NY.
Van der Waldt, G., 2023, ‘Financial management in local economic development agencies: A case study of South Africa’, South African Journal of Accounting Research 37(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/10291954.2022.2100001
World Bank, 2010, Monitoring and evaluation: Some tools, methods, and approaches, World Bank, Washington, DC.
World Bank, 2020, Public financial management and accountability: Strengthening governance systems, World Bank, Washington, DC.
| 
Email this article 
Hide
Show all
