Original Research

Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation: Reviewing an Inclusive Approach in the South Africa's Government Wide Monitoring and Evaluation

Noluthando Matsiliza
Africa’s Public Service Delivery & Performance Review | Vol 1, No 2 | a31 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/apsdpr.v1i2.31 | © 2012 Noluthando Matsiliza | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 22 November 2016 | Published: 01 September 2012

About the author(s)

Noluthando Matsiliza, Tshwane University of Technology, South Africa

Full Text:

PDF (260KB)

Abstract

The premise of this paper is to canvass for the inclusion of stakeholders in participating in the Government Wide Monitoring and Evaluation (GWM&E) using the participatory monitoring and evaluation (PM&E) approach. The focus is mainly on the practicality of using participatory methods as part of the agenda to cascade the implement the M&E into different stake-holders using various methods in South Africa. A variety of public participation methods should be recognised to benchmark for the inclusion of stakeholders at the local level in the evaluation and monitoring of public programmes and projects in order to allow more space for civil society engagement in development policies and social accountability. Participation is increasingly recognised by countries as an integral part of M&E process while it offers environment for civic participation in a more inclusive and responsive approach towards service delivery and budget  allocation in South Africa. Using a qualitative approach, conclusions and recommendations from this study contribute towards monitoring and evaluation of policies, programmes and projects in the field of Public Management. This study intends to address the paucity of literature on Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation in South Africa.

Keywords

Monitoring and Evaluation; Qualitative Approach; South Africa

Metrics

Total abstract views: 8447
Total article views: 9243

 

Crossref Citations

1. Beyond the Buzzword: A Framework for an Indigenous Relational Evaluation in Traditional Communities in Ghana
Evans S. Boadu, Isioma Ile
American Journal of Evaluation  vol: 45  issue: 3  first page: 467  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1177/10982140211048459

2. Imperatives for Co-operative Governance: A Case Study of Local Municipalities in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
Ivan G. Govender
Journal of Social Sciences  vol: 49  issue: 1-2  first page: 123  year: 2016  
doi: 10.1080/09718923.2016.11893605

3. Monitoring and evaluation of municipal planning
Noluthando S. Matsiliza
Public and Municipal Finance  vol: 6  issue: 4  first page: 15  year: 2017  
doi: 10.21511/pmf.06(4).2017.02

4. Institutionalising the evaluation function: A South African study of impartiality, use and cost
Caitlin Blaser Mapitsa, Takunda J. Chirau
Evaluation and Program Planning  vol: 75  first page: 38  year: 2019  
doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.04.005

5. An action framework for the participatory assessment of nature-based solutions in cities
Alexander P. N. van der Jagt, Arjen Buijs, Cynnamon Dobbs, Martina van Lierop, Stephan Pauleit, Thomas B. Randrup, Tom Wild
Ambio  vol: 52  issue: 1  first page: 54  year: 2023  
doi: 10.1007/s13280-022-01772-6

6. An evidence gap map on Made in Africa Evaluation approaches: Exploration of the achievements
Tebogo E. Fish
African Evaluation Journal  vol: 10  issue: 1  year: 2022  
doi: 10.4102/aej.v10i1.626

7. Community-based development and indigenous evaluation in Africa: insights from Ghana
Evans Sakyi Boadu, Isioma Ile
Journal of Contemporary African Studies  vol: 43  issue: 1  first page: 87  year: 2025  
doi: 10.1080/02589001.2024.2414023

8. Institutional design and utilisation of evaluation results in Uganda’s public universities: Empirical findings from Kyambogo University
James Kabuye, Benon C. Basheka
African Evaluation Journal  vol: 5  issue: 1  year: 2017  
doi: 10.4102/aej.v5i1.190