Original Research
The logframe as a monitoring and evaluation tool for government interventions in a chaotic and complex environment
Submitted: 10 June 2019 | Published: 30 January 2020
About the author(s)
Dominique E. Uwizeyimana, School of Public Management Governance and Public Policy, College of Business and Economics, University of Johannesburg, Soweto Campus, Johannesburg, South AfricaAbstract
Background: The logical framework approach (or logframe) as a tool for the monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of government interventions has gained popularity in M&E scholarly research. The term ‘interventions’ as used in this article refers to public policy, strategies, programmes and projects that are implemented by governments to address the socio-economic problems affecting the citizens.
Aim: The aim of this article was to assess the logframe as an M&E tool for government interventions in Africa and to close the knowledge gap in the current literature.
Setting: The logframe is currently used (in one form or another) by most multilateral and bilateral aid agencies that are operating as development partners across the Africa. Its popular use ignores the fact that the success and failure of government interventions do not follow a pre-deterministic logical sequence of events.
Methods: This research is qualitative and is based on a robust review of the existing literature on the use of the logframe in M&E and the theory of chaos and complexity.
Results: This article shows that government interventions are generally implemented and evaluated in a dynamic, ever-changing, complex and often chaotic environment.
Conclusion: Because of the dynamic, complex nature of the environment in which government interventions are implemented and evaluated, the logframe should be continuously adjusted to accommodate changes in the environment. In addition, its use in M&E should be limited to the level at which the changes on the evaluand and in the environment allow a certain level of stability, predictability and logic.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 6707Total article views: 18511
Crossref Citations
1. The pitfalls or gaps in monitoring and evaluation tools during Coronavirus disease 2019 era in South African municipalities
Babalo Yekani, Bethuel Sibongiseni Ngcamu, Sareesha Pillay
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478) vol: 12 issue: 10 first page: 13 year: 2023
doi: 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i10.3101
2. The impact evaluation of coronavirus disease 2019 on service delivery in South Africa
Babalo Yekani, Sibongiseni B. Ngcamu, Sareesha Pillay
Africa’s Public Service Delivery and Performance Review vol: 12 issue: 1 year: 2024
doi: 10.4102/apsdpr.v12i1.718
3. Management and leadership considerations for managing effective monitoring and evaluation systems in South African municipalities
Babalo Yekani, Sibongiseni B. Ngcamu, Sareesha Pillay
Journal of Local Government Research and Innovation vol: 5 year: 2024
doi: 10.4102/jolgri.v5i0.154
4. Sub- and non-state climate action: a framework to assess progress, implementation and impact
Thomas N. Hale, Sander Chan, Angel Hsu, Andrew Clapper, Cynthia Elliott, Pedro Faria, Takeshi Kuramochi, Shannon McDaniel, Milimer Morgado, Mark Roelfsema, Mayra Santaella, Neelam Singh, Ian Tout, Chris Weber, Amy Weinfurter, Oscar Widerberg
Climate Policy vol: 21 issue: 3 first page: 406 year: 2021
doi: 10.1080/14693062.2020.1828796
5. Theory of Change as a monitoring and evaluation tool aimed at achieving sustainable human settlements
Bongekile Y.C. Mvuyana
Africa’s Public Service Delivery and Performance Review vol: 11 issue: 1 year: 2023
doi: 10.4102/apsdpr.v11i1.659
